The debate is still on. I read about it on Reuters today morning that the Supreme Court (the earlier senetence gave an impression as if Supreme Court is reading) in the US state of Oregon is continuing the argument that whether the state police must obtain a search warrant in order to examine the data stored on an individual’s smartphone. Similar question has been raised in other states of the US too. Peoples’ opinions, so far, are divided.
How it works in the USA is – if anyone’s home or property needs to be searched, the police must get a search warrant after convincing the judge that there is a reason behind such suspicion or a possibility of law-breaking evidence at the said property, for instance, revolvers, computer files, explosives or even drugs. The police are also free to look through the suspect’s pockets, handbag or wallet if he/she is placed under suspicion or is arrested. The argument now is whether the police’s freedom to search also includes searching the suspect’s smartphone?
Considered relatively as a grey area, smartphones have become an issue when it comes to search. This is because it is not merely about listening to a phone conversation and keeping a tab on it, but also about checking one’s personal information. This personal information on the smartphone could include calendars, contacts, messages and even emails. Should the police be allowed to search all this without having a search warrant specifically for the same? That’s what the debate is about and one is yet to see if any ruling is passed to this effect.
